Monday, 31 December 2012

Wedged Between Clive Sinclair and Deborah Levy



The latest issue of the Jewish Quarterly (Winter 2012 Number 224) has hit the stands. 


In it you’ll find my reviews of Jewish Images in the Comics by Frederick Strömberg and Drawn Together by Robert & Aline Crumb.

You’ll also find contributions from Sarah Glidden, Joshua Plaut, Samantha Ellis, Sam Leith and Jonathyne Briggs.

Monday, 12 November 2012

Apocalypse, Nu?




The following review appeared in the Jewish Quarterly (Number 222 Summer 2012)

The Tel Aviv Dossier
by Lavie Tidhar & Nir Yaniv
CHIZINE PUBLICATIONS 2009
The Odyssey of Samuel Glass
by Bernard Kops
DAVID PAUL BOOKS 2012

As soon as things get better, history has taught the Jews, they can only get worse. Emerge from slavery a free people, enter your promised land, plant your vines and your fig trees, inaugurate your capital, erect a temple—and a mighty empire will descend on you, devastate your capital, demolish your temple and carry you off to a strange land. Gather your exiles, return to your homeland, reconstruct your commonwealth and your temple—and, soon enough, another great world power will come along and do it all again, only worse. You will be exiled from your places of exile. Your Golden Age (though what’s so ‘golden’ about it is a matter for debate) will be followed by an inquisition and expulsion. Emancipation will be followed by pogroms. The language you coin, the culture you fashion will go up, quite literally, in smoke. Is it any wonder, then, that there are those who say that the establishment of a Jewish state is merely a convenient way to gather a sufficient number of Jews together for the next major catastrophe?
Where will this catastrophe begin and who will be its instigator? Speculation is rife. Israel, naturally, is the location at the top of everyone’s list. The next Khmelnystky, Haman or Hitler is a matter of debate. The current forerunner is a loudmouth with nuclear ambitions. Novelists, Lavie Tidhar and Nir Yaniv, concur with the former conjecture, narrowing the location down to Tel Aviv, but deviate from the consensus when it comes to perpetrator. According to them Tel Aviv will be first obliterated, then transformed by an assailant the Children of Israel have not yet faced—an assailant that is not an autocrat, theocrat, nationalist, royalist, reactionary, national socialist or a dialectical materialist, an enemy that is, in fact, not human at all. Sentient whirlwinds, would you believe, will rise from the sea and wreak havoc on the party Mecca of the Mediterranean.   
The Tel Aviv Dossier by Tidhar and Yaniv, it goes without saying, is a work of imaginative fiction. Though set in a distinctly Jewish milieu this is not a work of Jewish imagination in the conventional sense. Absent are the customary demons, dybbuks, golems, and metamorphoses familiar from the fantastic writings of Bruno Schultz, Ansky, Cynthia Ozick, Der Nister and Isaac Bashevis Singer. The preternatural is not here a device to contrast tradition with modernity, a means to explore deeply buried psychological states, abstruse mystical or theoligico-political insights, a Chagallian canvas on which to paint the ills of society. Those are all Diaspora themes and this (albeit written in English by Hebrew speakers and featuring characters speaking in English and Hebrew translated into English) is an Israeli novel.
Well, not quite. Israeli writers, including those who dabble occasionally in the fantastic, are fairly hidebound in their allegiance to the aims of the social novel. Their science fiction takes the form of Orwellian prophecy (think of The Road to Ein Harod, Amos Kenan’s tale of an Israeli military coup) and their phantasmagoria is expressionistic (David Grossman) or quirkily ‘magic realist’ (Meir Shalev). Even Etgar Keret, a practitioner of the kind of absurdism exemplified by Eugène Ionesco, doesn’t stray too far from social realism. Tidhar and Yaniv, on the other hand, are the heirs of a counter-tradition unjustly sidelined and derogated by the literary establishment. They are the children of Wells and Verne and the lurid pulp magazines that spawned today’s horror and science fiction genres.
The Tel Aviv Dossier is a work of cosmic horror in the vein of H.P. Lovecraft, a deranged sci-fi extravaganza that turns its back on the world as we know it, and makes no bones about it. There is no plot, properly speaking. The authors quite literally present us with a dossier consisting of audio transcripts, chat logs, letters, podcasts and apocryphal documents—Bram Stoker employed a similar device for Dracula; today’s readers will recall the ‘found footage’ of films like Cannibal Holocaust and Blair Witch Project—to decipher ourselves. The storyline, however, a neo-Gnostic apocalypse narrative for the iPod generation, is easy enough to follow: incomprehensible cosmic entities erase Tel Aviv from the map, transform it into a bizarre other-dimensional zone, the arena for an eschatological battle between the rival forces of love and brutality.
Readers desperately seeking a cleverly camouflaged annex leading to social critique will be pleased to hear that the authors have taken the time to take some very pointed satirical swipes at contemporary Israeli culture, attitudes and perceptions. The deftly handled cast is broad (ufologists, a holidaying Londoner, the chief rabbi, a government assassin, documentary filmmakers, rogue historians, countless bit players), the characterisation swift and spot-on. They will, however, need a strong stomach, nerves of steel and an elastic sense of disbelief to cope with feral kindergarten children (whose bewilderment and descent into savagery is depicted with exquisite poignancy), a sociopathic fireman who rides his fire truck up a mountain that rises out of Dizengoff Center Mall, the floating disembodied head of a computer programmer, and Yeshiva bochers with Uzis parachuting behind enemy lines. Brash and blackly funny, the authors are well aware that they have tossed a hand grenade into the stuffy house of Israeli literature. At one point a spy sent to investigate conditions in the altered city encounters a gang of well-armed academics riding a steam-powered bus, a marvel of engineering and ingenuity powered by Tel Aviv’s great untapped natural resource—books. “Right now,” says Dganit, their leader, “we’re powering the engine with as much Amos Oz to get us to the moon and back! And when we run out—” “You never run out of Amos Oz!” someone shouts at the back. “We will use A.B. Yehoshua!’ she continues, unfazed. “Meir Shalev! Giants in their field! Mines to be, well—mined!”
For Tidhar and Yaniv catastrophe is a metafictional goldmine, a license to mash up biblical spectacle with Hollywood pyrotechnics, but for the eponymous hero of Bernard Kops’s The Odyssey of Sammy Glass, catastrophe is a private matter. Sammy’s world, Kops informs us, ends when his father drops dead of a massive heart attack.
Sammy Glass is no ordinary seventeen-year-old. A connoisseur of poetry, he spends an inordinate amount of time in his room fondling his leather-bound copy of Palgrave’s Golden Treasury (among other worthy tomes) and nursing his grief like Achilles moping in his tent. The hours he spends on YouTube or playing Diablo III with his Muswell Hill mates goes unrecorded, though Kops does concede him a mobile phone, and he is visited occasionally by Katie the foxy redhead from across the way who clearly wants more from Sammy than what she receives, a recital of Omar Khayyám’s Rubaiyat. Will anything get Sammy out of his room? His mother pins her hopes on chicken soup and matzo balls, though she makes the mistake of inviting David Simmons, the new man in her life, for Friday night dinner. Will anything get Sammy out of meeting his dead father’s rival, a man the young aesthete is quite prepared to dislike sight unseen? A trip through time with a rabbi who bursts out of his closet (and his febrile mind, one supposes) might just do the trick.
The Red Rabbi of Vitebsk, as the wonderworker calls himself, is a very unkosher Virgil. Spouting doctrines more suited to a Marx or a Lao Tzu than a Rabbi Zusha or a Rabbi Loew, he transports Sammy to the Russia of 1881. A significant year, as any student of Jewish history knows. The year before the assassination of Tsar Alexander II by members of Narodnaya Volya (‘The Peoples Will’, a Bakunin-inspired terrorist group) precipitated a cataclysmic wave of pogroms, the first death throes of shtetl life. Sammy, it turns out, is there to lend his great, great, great grandmother, Sarah, a hand in her current enterprise—an anarchist and a member of the People’s Will, Sarah has orders to kill the Tsar.
Kops, an important British poet and dramatist writing what is most likely (but hopefully not) his final novel, is the polar opposite of upstarts Yaniv and Tidhar, as different, as the titles of their books suggest, as a modern functionary’s dossier is to an epic poem.
The Odyssey of Sammy Glass epitomises the traditional Jewish imaginative novel. We have our momentous metaphysical themes (with his opening sentence, ‘Do the dead know that life still exists, somewhere?’ Kops declares his ambition), a meticulously constructed plot (we know, just as we know when we spy an axe in a Chekhov play, that the ashes of Sammy’s father, which his mother can’t bring herself to scatter, will play a symbolic role, sooner or later), domestic drama mythologized (Sammy falls instantly for Sarah, his passionate ancestor, a dead ringer for his beloved mom, and harbours an ill-concealed animus towards her new husband, Akiva, a stand-in, we must suppose, for David Simmons), allusions to the masters of literature and poesy (Shakespeare, Beckett, Elliot, Dr Seuss) and a roster of characters (a Yiddish acting troupe, a girl named Anne hiding in an attic, a gor’ blimey East End urchin) that, sadly, now exist only in fiction, some vanished in the mists of  time, others brutally erased from it. We have, in short, a stupendous Chagallian canvas, where, with the zest of a young sailor on shore leave and a zeida’s hard-won bittersweet sagacity, Kops vividly illustrates the words he puts in the Red Rabbi’s mouth: ‘Life is a celebration and also fatal’. And we have in time travelling Sammy Glass, an embodiment of the Jewish—no, the human—condition: the worst that can happen (worse than the malevolent cosmic monsters of pulp fiction) has already happened, is going to happen (even in nineteenth century Russia Sammy hears the echo of the cattle trucks) and the past, for better and worse, is constantly present.  
(Photo: Meira Puterman)

Friday, 12 October 2012

It's not about the bike

After this whole Lance Armstrong debacle I'm afraid I am no longer able to take a sport where men dress in skin-tight legwear seriously anymore.

Sunday, 5 August 2012

What took them so long?


The latest issue of the Jewish Quarterly (Summer 2012 Number 222) has hit the stands.

In it you’ll find my review of The Odyssey of Samuel Glass by Bernard Kops and The Tel Aviv Dossier by Lavie Tidhar & Nir Yaniv.

I can confidentially say that in its 57 year history The Jewish Quarterly has not published a review that manages to name check H.P. Lovecraft, Bram Stoker, Beckett, Dr Seuss and, um, er, Cannibal Holocaust. Until now.

Tuesday, 3 July 2012

A rat became the unit of currency


Notes towards an unwritten review of David Cronenberg’s Cosmopolis




Robert Pattinson spends three quarters of the movie cruising around in a white limo whose interior looks like a spaceship designed by a company better suited to producing surgical instruments. The pace is hypnotic (in other words, slow) and Cronenberg makes absolutely no concessions to his audience’s expectations. Peter Suschitzky’s cinematography is slick, in a cold and sterile way. The narrative jumps from scene to scene (it helps to have read the book). The characters are enigmatic (in other words, weird) and the dialogue is abstruse, philosophical, requires near-constant concentration, and sounds like a collaboration between Beckett and Mamet trying to channel JG Ballard parodying a critique of late capitalism. Everything is excruciatingly cerebral; the characters don’t even shut up during the sex and violence. Juliette Binoche sizzles, Paul Giamatti steals the show, and Kevin Durand is possessed by the ghost of Christopher Walken. Nobody but Cronenberg could make this film: Crash meets Crimes of the Future meets American Psycho (after the serial killer bits have been edited out) with a climax that echoes Dead Ringers and Videodrome simultaneously. Nobody but Cronenberg would want to make this film. Who wants to see a movie that consists of sporadic violence (though not enough to give you a real frisson) and protracted monologues about sex, technology, and asymmetrical prostate glands? Certainly not the audience I saw it with. There were five of us when the film started. Twenty minutes to the end I was the only one left in the theatre. I can’t wait for the DVD release.

Monday, 25 June 2012

Memories of the Space Age


When do urine bags become ‘humanity’s heritage’? When you leave them on the moon, that’s when. 



Sunday, 20 May 2012

Staying Power

The following review first appeared in Jewish Quartely Number 216, Winter 2010.


Ways of Staying
By Kevin Bloom

Glenhazel on a Saturday morning is not all that different from Golders Green on a Saturday morning. The Orthodox are out in the street, men and boys in black hats and suits, knitted kippot and tsitsit, women and girls in long skirts and sleeves, wives in sheitels, scarves and snoods. But, aside from Lubavitchers, you aren’t likely to see any Hassidim in this affluent, predominantly Jewish suburb. Johannesburg’s Jews are overwhelmingly Mitnagdim, descendants of Lithuanian Jews who fled successive waves of pogroms. Look closer and other, starker, differences become apparent. The houses are surrounded by high walls emblazoned with security signs and surmounted with electrified fencing. Behind every wall is a barking dog. Heavily armed guards (trained mercenaries, many of them veterans of Africa’s wars) prowl the streets of this gated community in Double Cab four-by-fours. And yet nobody feels entirely safe in this self-enforced ghetto—even with their private army. So why do they stay?

Why do they stay in a country that, as Kevin Bloom points out in Ways of Staying, his disquieting portrait of contemporary South Africa, averages 50 murders a day? Why not pack up, like so many others have, and leave for Israel, Australia, Canada? Why not live in Golders Green? Why remain in a country that, according to Time magazine, has some of the highest incidences of child and baby rape in the world? Why live in a place where (Bloom again) ‘murders are inevitable, a necessary tax of history’?

Don’t expect any satisfying answers from the author, a fourth generation South African Jew with a seemingly unbreakable attachment to his homeland. ‘Are,’ he asks, ‘any of these questions worth asking?’ Bloom never quite gets to grips with why the murderers murder and the rapists rape—their actual, private motivates rather than the heavily politicised motives ascribed to their horrendous acts (revenge, resentment, retribution for the near ineradicable inequality that nearly half a century of apartheid has bequeathed). In a book consisting largely of conversations, many of them wrenching testimonies, it is striking that Bloom, an accomplished journalist, does not interview any killers or rapists, convicted or otherwise. He has no palliatives or solutions to offer, nor does he present a particularly probing or original thesis about state of the nation. But that, paradoxically, is the book’s greatest strength. It is not his analysis but, rather, his masterful portraits—the man from an isolated, rural village in Kwazulu-Natal struggling to get his degree on a pitiful allowance and without running water, the Jewish mother whose young child is shot in a housebreaking, the resolute schoolgirl who recounts her rape ordeal—that will ensure that Ways of Staying, like Rian Malan’s My Traitor’s Heart and Greg Marinovich’s The Bang-bang Club, will become an enduring classic.

Ways of Staying begins, appropriately, with a funeral. The funeral of Bloom’s cousin, fashion designer Richard Bloom, murdered with his friend, the actor Brett Goldin, on Easter Sunday, April 16, 2006. The trial that follows turns the family’s private tragedy, along with the case of David Ratray, the renowned Anglo-Zulu War historian, shot dead in his Fugitives Drift Lodge by six armed men, into a media-stoked national obsession.

Speaking at his funeral Chief Mangosuthu Buthelezi, founder of the Inkatha Freedom Party and the traditional prime minister of the Zulu nation, thanked Ratray on behalf of the Zulu nation and its current king for his work as a historian and, poignantly given that his killers were black, for his contributions to reconciliation. He added his voice to the call, already made by public figures, opposition politicians and the general public in a series of highly publicised anti-crime vigils, that the country’s leaders, at the very least, acknowledge the severity of the crime problem. Shortly afterwards, a large bank (significantly, the bank is not named) allocated twenty million rand (approximately 1.8 million pounds) for a national advertising campaign to bring the problem to the attention of President Thabo Mbeki. ‘Local media reported that the government had accused the bank of “incitement”, and that the bank, fearing the consequences, had backed down,’ writes Bloom in a prudent, scrupulously impersonal tone. To outside eyes the accusation of ‘incitement’ for pointing out the obvious—the astonishing crime rate that affects all South Africans, regardless of the colour of their skin or the size of their bank accounts—might seem a tad bizarre, but to South Africans familiar with Mbeki’s obstinate refusal to recognise the extent of the AIDS crisis—or, indeed, his refusal to consider HIV the cause of AIDS—it was business as usual.

Well, if you can’t get your country’s leaders to change you can—in a democratic country, at least—change your leaders. Or so the theory goes. But for many white South Africans, Mbeki’s successor, Jacob Zuma, an outspoken populist and former South African Communist Party member, was a dismaying prospect. Would his ties to the far left prejudice him against white business interests? Charges of racketeering, money laundering, corruption and fraud (dropped), a sensational rape trial (acquitted), a fractious relationship with the media (ongoing) and an offbeat, to say the least, choice of campaign song, Lethu Mshini Wami (‘Bring Me My Machine Gun’) jangled white nerves. Amongst black voters, however, Zuma was the clear favourite. Once again the country was fracturing along racial lines. Bloom, accompanied by Branko Brkic, his editor at Maverick magazine, covers the turbulent Polokwane conference where Zuma was elected President of the ANC, deposing Mbeki. For Brkic (who escaped from a disintegrating Yugoslavia in 1991), the internecine drama of the conference and the incendiary pronouncements of Zuma’s supporters bore chilling parallels to the ascension of Milosevic. Bloom, however, is no Chicken Little. Ahead of the curve (Zuma’s approval ratings have been climbing steadily) Bloom points to Zuma’s inaugural speech where, unlike his predecessor, he acknowledges the crime problem head on. ‘If we were able to defeat vigilantism and the apartheid system,’ he quotes Zuma as saying, ‘what can stop us from defeating this ugly factor that has tainted our democracy?’

A wave of pogroms, perhaps. Just at the moment of highest hope, ‘xenophobic riots’ (as the pogroms have become known in South African parlance) directed against kwerekwere (a derogatory term for ‘dark-skinned foreigners’, refugees and illegal immigrants from across Africa) break out, an appalling coup de theatre (rather like the cheap dramatics, Bloom himself employs, most notably the cliff hanger gap which he uses with annoying, but effective, regularity) that threatens, once again, to turn the dream of a ‘rainbow nation’ into Brkic’s nightmare. But Bloom, shaken, his reserves of clear-eyed optimism strained to their limits, will not give up on his country. Right until the final line of this sad, troubling, but, ultimately, hopeful book Bloom is searching for ways of staying.

Wednesday, 16 May 2012

Wednesday, 1 February 2012

A Joust Solution


Fred Goodwin (hubristic former head of the Royal Bank of Scotland) has been stripped of his knighthood. Why pick on Mister Goodwin? I say we take everyone’s knighthoods away. Let them earn their titles the old-fashioned way—by besting their opponents in jousts, smiting heathens in far-off lands, and rescuing dusky maidens from fire-breathing dragons.